V ALPO-Japan Latest
Uranus Image 2011/11/12(UT)
Frank J Melillo
Frank
Frank J Melillo(254mm SC) |
The idea was to image Uranus with a 200mm telephoto lens with the
stars' background and then compare with both without and with the methane
absorption filter (890nm+/-10nm). I use star '1' and star '2' as
references.
This will help me to locate where Uranus should be in methane light.
Uranus
is extremely dark at this wavelength. Anything that is not methane like a
white spot should be very bright. Therefore, I would like to see whether
if Uranus has any surge of brightness when the white spot is on the disk
in
methane light.
First on October 31st, 2011 at 3:10 UT (top two images), I imaged
Uranus with a 200mm telephoto lens without any filter(s). The CM was at
205
degrees longitude and the white spot's CM was at 003 degrees. Therefore,
the
spot was not out and Uranus is not visible.
Then on Nov. 12th, 2011 at 0:10 UT (bottom two images), Uranus' CM was
at 36 degrees longitude and the spot's longitude was at 349 degrees
longitude. Therefore it was on the disk at the time I was imaging. The
image was
taken without the filter to see Uranus against the star's background.
Then
I imaged it with a methane absorption filter (890nm+/-10nm) with the same
stars that marked as '1' and '2'. There is no surge of brightness. Uranus
is
still not visible even with the white spot on the disk.
So far, Uranus is not visible in methane light even with and without
the spot on the disk. Perhaps the white spot is not bright enough or not
enough contrast for Uranus to be visible or the aperture of the 200mm
telephoto lens is too small.
[Frank J Melillo Holtsville NY U.S.A]